Planned parenthood and the state of california is charging two investigative journalists with 15 felonies for recording “confidential conversations” that led to the release of a video supposedly showing the foundation to be selling papy parts & tissues rather than donating them to “scientific research.”
Yet another fine example of how the left and democrats are EVERYTHING they CLAIM to be fighting AGAINST.
If you honestly support these acts, then I highly suggest you reconsider your values and take a good, long look at what you truly believe in. You’re being played, and I wish there was more I could do to help you.

Send articles or topics that you would like me to make a video about on Twitter: @TheSourSage

I’m also on Minds.com if you’d like to check out my dismal page there: https://www.minds.com/TheSourSage

If you would like your content to be removed from my videos, contact me on twitter or at [email protected]

Sources:

https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/morning-mix/wp/2017/03/28/two-activists-who-filmed-undercover-videos-of-planned-parenthood-charged-with-15-felonies/?utm_term=.dea635a00e90

http://hotair.com/archives/2016/09/05/taxpayer-funded-planned-parenthood-wrote-bill-jail-pro-lifers/

http://www.nydailynews.com/news/national/felony-charges-filmed-planned-parenthood-article-1.3012262

https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/billTextClient.xhtml?bill_id=201520160AB1671

http://www.latimes.com/opinion/editorials/la-ed-planned-parenthood-video-bill-20160831-snap-story.html

https://stream.org/california-legislature-passes-bill-jail-journalists-investigate-abortion-industry/

Music:

Welcome to Chaos - Ross Budgen:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=q5w5VX4tAD4
https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCQKG
https://instagram.com/rossbugden/
https://twitter.com/RossBugden

This video is protected under U.S. Title 17, Chapter 1, Article 107: Otherwise known as Fair Use:
Notwithstanding the provisions of sections 106 and 106A, the fair use of a copyrighted work, including such use by reproduction in copies or phonorecords or by any other means specified by that section, for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching (including multiple copies for classroom use), scholarship, or research, is not an infringement of copyright. In determining whether the use made of a work in any particular case is a fair use the factors to be considered shall include—
(1) the purpose and character of the use, including whether such use is of a commercial nature or is for nonprofit educational purposes;
(2) the nature of the copyrighted work;
(3) the amount and substantiality of the portion used in relation to the copyrighted work as a whole; and
(4) the effect of the use upon the potential market for or value of the copyrighted work.
The fact that a work is unpublished shall not itself bar a finding of fair use if such finding is made upon consideration of all the above factors.